Thursday, June 17, 2010

Re: [Geology2] CRIME: Geologists Might Be Charged For Not Predicting Quake



It's not fair, Allison,

Earthquake prediction is always an iffy proposition. There are certain signals, Radon emission, as in this case, sulphur in aquifers, and the unrest of animals, but these examples don't occur every time. I don't see how this court can hold their geologists' feet to the fire, with a world wide consensus that there is no logical method to e-quake prediction.

Lin

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Allison Loukanis <allison.m.loukanis@att.net> wrote:
 

I really don't think  this is fair.. you all know more about this stuff than i do but isn't prediction of an earthquake really just an educated guess? I mean, there is sophisticated euquipment and all to try to make a predicton but isnt' an earthquake like a hurricane in that there is reallly no  way to accurately predict what will happen? Allison

--- On Thu, 6/17/10, Victor Healey <4.vic.healey@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Victor Healey <4.vic.healey@gmail.com>
Subject: [Geology2] CRIME: Geologists Might Be Charged For Not Predicting Quake
To: geology2@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, June 17, 2010, 3:43 AM

 
Geologists Might Be Charged For Not Predicting Quake
   from the google-will- no-doubt- be-found- at-fault dept.


--


Sent from my iPad



--
(Gars O'Higgins Station penguins)
http://wiinterrr.blogspot.com/
http://penguinnewstoday.blogspot.com/
http://penguinology.blogspot.com/
(Twilight Saga commentary)
http://throughgoldeneyes.blogspot.com/
(Volcano/CalFire Watch)
http://www.netvibes.com/volcanowatch


One does not discover new lands without consenting to lose sight of the shore for a very long time.

-- Andre Gide

>^,,^<  


__._,_.___


Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___
at

No comments:

Post a Comment