Tuesday, November 2, 2010

Re: [californiadisasters] Civil Unrest Notice for "The City" (11/01/10-PM)



Of course the LA Times is reporting there was rioting and we can't expect the Chron to be objective then we have to go with the Times' version of events, right? ;-p

On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Kim Noyes <kimnoyes@gmail.com> wrote:
Dan,

My pleasure and I agree with you there was not a riot last night, merely that one almost broke out.
The professional men and women of the San Francisco Police Department kept the lid on things or otherwise there would have been rioting because there were folks in that crowd whom wanted to rioted and were there to riot as there always seems to be nowadays.

Kim


On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Dan Waterhouse <gydanw@cvip.net> wrote:
 

Kim--thank you for your explanation of things. I'll end this thread thusly:
 
Five arrests does not a riot make.
 
--dan






__._,_.___


Be sure to check out our Links Section at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/californiadisasters/links
Please join our Discussion Group at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/californiadisasters_discussion/ for topical but extended discussions started here or for less topical but nonetheless relevant messages.




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment