Re: [californiadisasters] CA's Nuclear Plants Are Earthquake Safe: Operator

ALL forms of energy production have their pros and cons, positives and negatives, and each society must decide for itself what is best.
Nukes are the best form of energy production 99.999999% of the time when there is no M9.0 mega-thrust great quake occurring directly under the plant that perhaps causes it to experience a melt-down.
Fact of the matter is that we don't discontinue commercial aviation just because a plane with 100's of passengers crashes from time to time killing all aboard.
Neither should nuclear power generation be discarded based upon this, particularly when we don't like fossil fuels as much as we used to due to concern over global warming and the limits and drawbacks of solar and wind and tidal power generation.

Kimmer

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Richard Bixler <karrie_scott@hotmail.com> wrote:

 

I wonder what the environmentalist are going to say about nuclear power once all of this is said and done..? I have a feeling that nuclear power in the future is NOT going to be an option because they will deem it too dangerous and not effective. 

Scott Bixler

--
Check out http://groups.yahoo.com/group/californiadisasters/
Read our blog at http://eclecticarcania.blogspot.com/
Visit me on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/derkimster
Visit my Myspace at http://www.myspace.com/kimusinteruptus
We have an Ebay store at http://stores.ebay.com/K-K-Earthwerks

__._,_.___

Be sure to check out our Links Section at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/californiadisasters/links
Please join our Discussion Group at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/californiadisasters_discussion/ for topical but extended discussions started here or for less topical but nonetheless relevant messages.

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___