I agree. That is a better term. Allison
From: coyote <coyote2@ymail.com>
To: "geology2@yahoogroups.com" <geology2@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 4:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Geology2] your opinions
No. That's why "climate change" is a better term for the (well-established overall global) warming of the planet.
For example, if climate change shuts down the Gulf Stream, the UK will become much colder (i.e. more like elsewhere at it's latitude). Many global climate patterns, if disrupted, will similarly do more than simple average warming everywhere.
Also interesting is that adding energy to climate would tend to exaggerate all manner of weather. Another reason "climate change" is a better term.
For example, if climate change shuts down the Gulf Stream, the UK will become much colder (i.e. more like elsewhere at it's latitude). Many global climate patterns, if disrupted, will similarly do more than simple average warming everywhere.
Also interesting is that adding energy to climate would tend to exaggerate all manner of weather. Another reason "climate change" is a better term.
From: Allison Maricelli-Loukanis <allison.ann@att.net>
To: "geology2@yahoogroups.com" <geology2@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 12:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Geology2] your opinions
I am just a layperson, not a geologist. But I note that while the Southern states have become somewhat warmer, Milwaukee has not. Wouldn't global warming warm up everywhere?
__._,_.___
No comments:
Post a Comment