On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Louis N. Molino, Sr. <lnmolino@aol.com>wrote:
>
>
> I don't know if MAD would apply. Say Libya had some nukes (multiple even
> for arguments sake) they launch a few towards us and Israel again for the
> scenario. Assuming we kept Israel on a short leash as we have with SCUDS and
> the possible use of or threat of the use of BIO and or CHEM stuff in the
> oh not so distant past.
>
> I see the rest of the planet turning their back on Libya real fast and that
> carton showing where Libya use to be as being a cake of New Mexico Glass
> being very real. Or in this case we now have a use for those Neutron Bombs
> which were one of two good things to come from the Carter era.
>
> --
> Louis N. Molino, Sr.
> FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI
> Training Program Manager,
> Fire & Safety Specialists, Inc.
> 540 Graham Road,
> College Station, Texas USA 77845
>
> (979) 412-0890 Cell Phone
> (979) 690-7559 Office Phone
> (979) 690-7562 Office Fax
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kim Noyes <kimnoyes@gmail.com>
> To: californiadisasters <californiadisasters@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sun, Mar 20, 2011 6:19 pm
> Subject: Re: [californiadisasters] Electromagnetic Pulse: Effects on the
> U.S. Power Grid
>
>
>
> *M.A.D. would still apply in this scenario.... any nation launching an
> E.M.P. attack upon the U.S. would A) Risk getting nuked right out of the
> starting gates before their vehicles even launched their warheads as we saw
> their launches from orbit and tracked their I.C.B.M.'s headed towards our
> homeland as we could not know they were not actually armed with regular
> nukes and B) Assuming we waited to counterstrike after we experienced the
> effects of the E.M.P. attack we would reserve the right to treat the attack
> as a regular nuclear attack and counterstrike with actual nukes aimed at
> ground targets bearing in mind that our essential military assets have their
> electronics hardened against E.M.P. effects leaving the civilian sector of
> our civilization to suffer whatever E.M.P. effects the attack achieved.
>
> Kimmer*
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 4:04 PM, James Nelson <jnelson_lifesaver@yahoo.com
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> Granted, Forstchen's talks about a terrorism scenario with multiple
>> nuke air bursts over different parts of the country (remember the 'missile
>> launch' off of the west coast last fall?) but as Kim points out, it could be
>> a natural cause like a large CME... It doesn't sound like the system would
>> withstand any large hit.
>>
>> -
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Check out http://groups.yahoo.com/group/californiadisasters/
> Read our blog at http://eclecticarcania.blogspot.com/
> Visit me on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/derkimster
> Visit my Myspace at http://www.myspace.com/kimusinteruptus
> We have an Ebay store at http://stores.ebay.com/K-K-Earthwerks
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------
Be sure to check out our Links Section at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/californiadisasters/links
Please join our Discussion Group at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/californiadisasters_discussion/ for topical but extended discussions started here or for less topical but nonetheless relevant messages.Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/californiadisasters/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/californiadisasters/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
californiadisasters-digest@yahoogroups.com
californiadisasters-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
californiadisasters-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
No comments:
Post a Comment