Ben wrote:
"Sure, the Princeton study says that the Deccan traps were not at the antipode of the Chicxulub impact, but that study merely accepts the Standard Theory( sic) at face value".--WRONG There was a wide spread supposition that the Deccan Traps WERE an antipodal eruption before this (and a few other) studies that showed the DTs erupted over several million years and the eruptions started before Chicxulub!
Ben also wrote:
"Although my theory does not agree with the Standard Theory(sic) regarding the location of the Deccan traps in relation to the antipode of the Chicxulub impact, I regard this disagreement as a disagreement based upon reasoned and knowledgeable analysis, rather than disagreement based upon ignorance of other relevant arguments."
WRONG: Firstly, "Denial" is not a river in Africa. Show me! What are the present coordinates for the Chicxulub and antipode centers at time of impact? State your CPE. I want to see in writing your knowledgeable analysis. (Given the errors I have also seen in your theory It would add credibility to who assessed it as knowledgeable).
Secondly, it isn't "Standard Theory" it is Plate Tectonic Theory=PTT.
Thirdly, some researchers actually did the math, correlated magnetic orientations , calculated polar locations, ages of rocks and validated vectors( speed and direction) for plate movement. I loathe your flippant blow off of legitimately developed science when you have deluded yourself that you somehow--without a modicum of personal research in evidence -- have the "truth"!
Fourthly, Regarding your post: You change the focus of your responses without ever addressing our responses and go on to ignore answering the deficiencies. (Spoiler Alert: The list has accidentally entered the troll banquet zone).
Fifthly, you've been asked at least 6 times before for something concrete other than the muzings of your "rationale" and at least 6 times you have ignored them. This means you've a hidden agenda and it also means that there is nothing to be gained other than irritation by continuing to indulge your rather one way need to express your faulty logic, "ad nasuem".
Finally, my advice is go form a yahoo group to discuss your theory--Make sure you give it a snappy name and let us know when it is up for business. You claim to want constructive criticisms and to be shown the errors in your theory. See how many takers you get. If you do this, we'll know that you are sincere in what you say you want.
Eman
WRONG: Firstly, "Denial" is not a river in Africa. Show me! What are the present coordinates for the Chicxulub and antipode centers at time of impact? State your CPE. I want to see in writing your knowledgeable analysis. (Given the errors I have also seen in your theory It would add credibility to who assessed it as knowledgeable).
Secondly, it isn't "Standard Theory" it is Plate Tectonic Theory=PTT.
Thirdly, some researchers actually did the math, correlated magnetic orientations , calculated polar locations, ages of rocks and validated vectors( speed and direction) for plate movement. I loathe your flippant blow off of legitimately developed science when you have deluded yourself that you somehow--without a modicum of personal research in evidence -- have the "truth"!
Fourthly, Regarding your post: You change the focus of your responses without ever addressing our responses and go on to ignore answering the deficiencies. (Spoiler Alert: The list has accidentally entered the troll banquet zone).
Fifthly, you've been asked at least 6 times before for something concrete other than the muzings of your "rationale" and at least 6 times you have ignored them. This means you've a hidden agenda and it also means that there is nothing to be gained other than irritation by continuing to indulge your rather one way need to express your faulty logic, "ad nasuem".
Finally, my advice is go form a yahoo group to discuss your theory--Make sure you give it a snappy name and let us know when it is up for business. You claim to want constructive criticisms and to be shown the errors in your theory. See how many takers you get. If you do this, we'll know that you are sincere in what you say you want.
Eman
__._,_.___
No comments:
Post a Comment