Tuesday, January 28, 2014

Re: [Geology2] More Antipodal Theory -- Final Answer

Dear Eman,

Thanks for the detailed response with good clear examples of why rapid movement won't work.

I can see why you don't believe that this is possible. Although I could argue that there may be a threshold level at which a large enough impact could produce this kind of movement, I would have to recognize that I have no actual geological evidence to support this position. As you note, all of the actual geological evidence indicates that this type of movement is not possible.

Your constructive criticism continues to be quite helpful to my understanding of the actual issues related to a workable antipodal theory.

Thanks for your help.


Ben Fishler

From: MEM <mstreman53@yahoo.com>
To: "geology2@yahoogroups.com" <geology2@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 6:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Geology2] More Antipodal Theory -- Final Answer

Other than a simple dismissal I expanded my remarks so the other readers there may be, so they can understand the counter points to your theory of super natural/super ordinary angular directed force and impact imparted plate movement. Hopefully their understanding of impact geology will be deepened.


Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe


No comments:

Post a Comment