Tuesday, May 5, 2015

Re: [Geology2] M7.4 NEW BRITAIN REGION, PAPUA NEW GUINEA



the two events were not even on the same plate.
 To borrow from chaos theory, how can we know that Nepal's quake wasn't "triggered" by butterfly wings flapping causing a chain of events leading to a hurricane 40 years ago which set off a slippage on a fault which snowballed into a major quake. ad nauseum?  

We can rarely know anything of intervention cause an effect. but we can are reasoned judgments and I make the case for a given position rather than pursue superstition..  One factor is the lack of proxomity.

Eman

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

From:"Rick Bates HappyMoosePhoto@gmail.com [geology2]" <geology2@yahoogroups.com>
Date:Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:04
Subject:Re: [Geology2] M7.4 NEW BRITAIN REGION, PAPUA NEW GUINEA

 

Kate,

How do we KNOW this wasn't triggered by Nepal?

The timing and distance is pretty close... globally speaking. 

73,
Rick wa6nhc

Tiny iPhone 5 keypad, typos are inevitable

On May 4, 2015, at 9:22 PM, Kim Noyes kimnoyes@gmail.com [geology2] <geology2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 



Globe with Earthquake Location

M7.4 - NEW BRITAIN REGION, PAPUA NEW GUINEA


__._,_.___
Posted by: MEM <mstreman53@yahoo.com>



__,_._,___
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)