RE: [californiadisasters] breaking news out of san bruno

1confirm doa,i am sure more to come.






 

---

To: californiadisasters@yahoogroups.com
From: mdt@franksrails.com
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 20:50:31 -0700
Subject: Re: [californiadisasters] breaking news out of san bruno

 

The brush fire is a result of the gas main break. I've been listening to this via scanner, once it was charged again, since the tone out for 3 alarms went out.

Albeit about 5 minutes ago I shut everything off as it was too much, along with not feeling well, and I know some crews down there currently from Marin.

Regards,

-Frank C.

On Sep 9, 2010, at 8:42 PM, thomas billman wrote:

 

k yahoo is slow, when the 5th alarm was sent out, on the same scanner feed there was a tone out for a full response for a wildland fire with a plane down in the area of this fire, When the news went live on this video feed there was a report that the fire was caused a a plane crash, well the chief on location said that there was no plane crash involve. There were many reports of a plane crash that started this fire, Dispatch checked with all of the towers and said there is no report of any planes missing. So the report of a plane crash is false, there is still a large brush fire going along with the houses burning that you see on the video. If you listen to the scanner feed you will hear both the brush fire and the gas main break fire.






 

---

To: californiadisasters@yahoogroups.com
From: mdt@franksrails.com
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 20:33:37 -0700
Subject: Re: [californiadisasters] breaking news out of san bruno

 

I said nothing about a plane, other than the local area ATC tower's cleared it as NO PLANES ARE MISSING.

Regards,

-Frank C.

On Sep 9, 2010, at 8:19 PM, Infowolf1@aol.com wrote:

 

but you just said no plane involved, but said "the plane that crashed in the

wildland" and now say they are the same thing. So are you saying no

plane in the residential fire, but a plane did crash in the nearby wildland

fire? What are you saying?

 

 

In a message dated 9/9/2010 7:59:31 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, mdt@franksrails.com writes:

 

The wildland/residential fire in San Bruno.

Regards,

-Frank C.

On Sep 9, 2010, at 7:51 PM, Infowolf1@aol.com wrote:

 

ok so what wildland where?

 

In a message dated 9/9/2010 7:51:28 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, t_billman@hotmail.com writes:

 

he chief just reported no plane nvolve, the plane that crashed i inthe wildland






 

---

To: californiadisasters@yahoogroups.com
From: mdt@franksrails.com
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 19:49:03 -0700
Subject: Re: [californiadisasters] breaking news out of san bruno

 

Thank you for the clarification there.

Regards,

-Frank C.

On Sep 9, 2010, at 7:46 PM, Infowolf1@aol.com wrote:

 

I sent this before anyone posted, it just posted now.

 

In a message dated 9/9/2010 7:45:55 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, mdt@franksrails.com writes:

 

Again, Not plane related.

Regards,

-Frank C.

On Sep 9, 2010, at 7:06 PM, Infowolf1@aol.com wrote:

 

A plane coming into SFO crashed at San Bruno Ave. and Skyline

Blvd. I am watching this mess on TV right now.

 

it hit into an all residential area, flames no hot firefighters can't get

near it. SFO says no planes missing, must have been a charter

jet but it is no small prop plane, too much fire and heat for it not

to be jet fuel involved. I figured that and the newscaster just said

the same, something is fuelling all that fire.

 

Mary Christine Erikson

__._,_.___

Be sure to check out our Links Section at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/californiadisasters/links
Please join our Discussion Group at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/californiadisasters_discussion/ for topical but extended discussions started here or for less topical but nonetheless relevant messages.

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___