I am not a local but I was the first to ask questions on what as going on. That's why I asked was there 2 incidents or what? For the person that said that they were listening to the fire when the 3rd alarm went out you then should have heard the page go out for the wildland fire wit a plane down! What the problem is yahoo is not keeping up with emails that are being sent, so some emails are getting received before others. here is now a 2cd report of a doa on a sidewalk near where the fire started. I am sorry for any mis comms that any one read.
To: californiadisasters@yahoogroups.com
From: fire4hyer@yahoo.com
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 03:59:56 +0000
Subject: Re: [californiadisasters] breaking news out of san Bruno
Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®
You need to slow way down and listen to what everyone is telling you, as your facts are incorrect. I don't know where you live, but several of us are locals, with local media coverage, RadioReference, Yahoo Groups, Twitter, and yes even our scanners running.
There is no plane, verified by FAA and IC. Yes there is a Wildland fire, as there is a canyon which is burning at 10 acres, directly in the area of the fire.
Look at the posts, as we are providing all the information you need to listen and watch the fire.
Regards, Brad
From: californiadisasters@yahoogroups.com [mailto:californiadisasters@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Infowolf1@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 8:20 PM
To: californiadisasters@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [californiadisasters] breaking news out of san bruno
but you just said no plane involved, but said "the plane that crashed in the
wildland" and now say they are the same thing. So are you saying no
plane in the residential fire, but a plane did crash in the nearby wildland
fire? What are you saying?
In a message dated 9/9/2010 7:59:31 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, mdt@franksrails.com writes:
The wildland/residential fire in San Bruno.
Regards,
-Frank C.
On Sep 9, 2010, at 7:51 PM, Infowolf1@aol.com wrote:
ok so what wildland where?
In a message dated 9/9/2010 7:51:28 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, t_billman@hotmail.com writes:
he chief just reported no plane nvolve, the plane that crashed i inthe wildland
To: californiadisasters@yahoogroups.com
From: mdt@franksrails.com
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 19:49:03 -0700
Subject: Re: [californiadisasters] breaking news out of san bruno
Thank you for the clarification there.
Regards,
-Frank C.
On Sep 9, 2010, at 7:46 PM, Infowolf1@aol.com wrote:
I sent this before anyone posted, it just posted now.
In a message dated 9/9/2010 7:45:55 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, mdt@franksrails.com writes:
Again, Not plane related.
Regards,
-Frank C.
On Sep 9, 2010, at 7:06 PM, Infowolf1@aol.com wrote:
A plane coming into SFO crashed at San Bruno Ave. and Skyline
Blvd. I am watching this mess on TV right now.
it hit into an all residential area, flames no hot firefighters can't get
near it. SFO says no planes missing, must have been a charter
jet but it is no small prop plane, too much fire and heat for it not
to be jet fuel involved. I figured that and the newscaster just said
the same, something is fuelling all that fire.
Mary Christine Erikson
__._,_.___
Be sure to check out our Links Section at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/californiadisasters/links
Please join our Discussion Group at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/californiadisasters_discussion/ for topical but extended discussions started here or for less topical but nonetheless relevant messages.
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment