Thanks, I will.
Jerry
-----Original Message-----
From: Kim Noyes <kimnoyes@gmail.com>
To: californiadisasters@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, Jul 27, 2011 3:02 pm
Subject: Re: [californiadisasters] South Ops News & Notes Update (07/27/11-8AM)
No, potassium permanganate as opposed to naphthalene palmitate (napalm).
Google DAID (Delayed Aerial Ignition Device) for more information.
Kimmer
From: Kim Noyes <kimnoyes@gmail.com>
To: californiadisasters@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, Jul 27, 2011 3:02 pm
Subject: Re: [californiadisasters] South Ops News & Notes Update (07/27/11-8AM)
No, potassium permanganate as opposed to naphthalene palmitate (napalm).
Google DAID (Delayed Aerial Ignition Device) for more information.
Kimmer
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Jerrywpar <Jerrywpar@aol.com> wrote:
Like Napalm?
Jerry
-----Original Message-----
From: Cassidy Carman <millitaryman@gmail.com>
To: californiadisasters@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, Jul 27, 2011 2:42 pm
Subject: Re: [californiadisasters] South Ops News & Notes Update (07/27/11-8AM)
They mean backfiring started via either Helicopter or Fixed Wing aircraft
--
Cassidy Carman
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 2:40 PM, newnethboy <kef413@gmail.com> wrote:
What do they mean by "aerial ignition"? Lightning? Backfiring from aircraft?
If lightning or other natural occurrence, why would that prevent any large
uphill runs?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kim Noyes" <kimnoyes@gmail.com>
To: "CaliforniaDisasters" <californiadisasters@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:25 AM
Subject: [californiadisasters] South Ops News & Notes Update (07/27/11-8AM)
:
:
:
> 07/27
>
> 0800
>
> *Lion *fire grew approximately 2,863 acres. Of those acres, approximately
> 1,200 acres were aerial ignited. The aerial ignition prevented any large
> uphill runs.
>
> The main fire burned into the areas that had been ignited by aerial
> ignition. **
> Source:
> http://gacc.nifc.gov/oscc/predictive/intelligence/news_notes/index.htm
__._,_.___
No comments:
Post a Comment